Padilla has been indicted for actions that he took prior to joining the armed forces associated with Al Qaeda. It is called the rule of law, and we should not surrender it so readily merely because the President desires it. Padilla may well be a very bad fellow, but we have a method of dealing with such bad fellows. citizens and claims the right to hold them indefinitely for our protection. The fact that the government's story about why Padilla was a threat has changed so frequently should give us pause the next time the government asserts that we should trust it when it rounds up U.S. The Padilla case is a sobering lesson in how much leeway the President has to imprison and detain people for long periods of time in violation of the Constitution.
These assertions now ring hollow- Hamdi is free, and Padilla is in the criminal justice system. In both cases, the Administration argued that that it was of the utmost necessity to detain them indefinitely and that it could not give these men the constitutional protections ordinarily afforded criminal defendants without severely damaging national security. Now it has indicted Padilla to avoid facing a simliar rebuff by the U.S. Citizenship and a promise that he would not sue. You may recall that, following the Hamdi decision last year, the Administration decided not to give Yaser Hamdi a hearing, but instead released Hamdi to Saudi Arabia, extracting in return a surrender of Hamdi's U.S. It will take years for a citizen to exhaust his appeals and reach the Supreme Court and when the citizen finally gets to the Supreme Court, the Administration has the option to indict and moot the case (as it did with Padilla) or, if the Court's personnel have changed sufficiently in the interim, risk an appeal to the Supremes. It can, if it needs to, declare someone an enemy combantant, thrown them into a military prison, and interrogate them at its leisure. The Administration now knows that the Fourth Circuit is a Constitution-free zone. citizen within the geographical boundaries of that circuit. That result is particularly worthy of note, for the Fourth Circuit opinion may yet come in handy if the Administration needs to hold another U.S.
(See Marty Lederman's post here for an analysis). citizens like Padilla as unlawful combatants. It also leaves standing the Fourth Circuit's decision in the Padilla case, which broadly upheld the President's power to detain U.S. citizen, because the AUMF was not a legitimate suspension of the writ of habeas corpus).īy indicting Padilla now, The Bush Administration moots Padilla's appeal to the Supreme Court. Padilla thought Padilla was unconstitutionally confined, while Justice Scalia, who joined the majority, made clear that the SeptemAuthorization for the Use of Military Force did not justify detaining a U.S. The Administration counted votes and figured that even with a replacement for Justice O'Connor, it would likely lose in the Supreme Court. Now it has backtracked in one of the most prominent cases and done precisely what it said it could not do- treat Padilla as a criminal defendant. It has insisted that 9/11 changed everything and that terrorism must be dealt with through novel methods that dispense with the ordinary protections that the Constitution affords the accused. Since 9/11 the Bush Administration has sharply criticized others for daring to suggest that citizens accused of terrorism should be dealt with through the criminal justice system. In today's indictment, the Justice Department alleges neither act instead it claims that Padilla had traveled abroad to become "a violent jihadist" and that he had conspired to send "money, physical assets and new recruits" overseas to engage in acts of terrorism." Later the Justice Department changed that to an allegation that he planned to set fire to (or blow up) an apartment building in Chicago. Originally the Justice Department claimed that Padilla had planned to detonate a "dirty bomb" (i.e., one that would explode radioactive nuclear waste) in the United States.
government formally indicted Jose Padilla, an American citizen arrested in the United States who had been held as an enemy combatant for three years outside the reach of the criminal justice system. University of Chicago Law School Faculty Blog Rothman's Roadmap to the Right of Publicity Reporters Committee For Freedom of the Press International Economic Law and Policy Blog The Anti-Torture Memos (arranged by topic) The Anti-Torture Memos: Balkinization Posts on Torture, Interrogation, Detention, War Powers, and OLC Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at Ĭompendium of posts on Hobby Lobby and related cases